Wouldn’t a better solution to health insurance issues be to have individuals more in control?

Posted by admin

If more individuals purchased insurance for themselves and shopped for the best deal, wouldn’t the insurance companies be forced to be more competitive? Does this work for auto insurance? and how are the coverages different?

Thanks.

Of COURSE it would, but then how would the government/liberals CONTROL these same individuals?

Posted in: Health Insurance For Individuals Comments(3) April 2010


3 Responses to “Wouldn’t a better solution to health insurance issues be to have individuals more in control?”

  1. boodreauxthecoonass Says:
    April 9th, 2010 at 11:49 pm

    Of COURSE it would, but then how would the government/liberals CONTROL these same individuals?
    References :

  2. grump56 Says:
    April 10th, 2010 at 12:35 am

    The difference is most employers pay for the majority of your premiums.
    References :

  3. Sunshine Says:
    April 10th, 2010 at 12:52 am

    Sounds good in theory, but it hasn’t worked. Individuals don’t usually have the lobbying money of the insurance companies, and when you are sick, most individuals don’t have the resources to fight the insurance company when they deny their claims. They have the upper hand, by far, they’ve abused it, and it needs to be drastically overhauled.

    People have tried that. Even the "best" and "most reputable" insurance companies have been corrupt. Allstate agreed to a huge settlement when their internal documents were slipped out, because even one of the "best" is corrupt and greedy. It simply hasn’t worked.
    References :

Leave a Reply